The Case for National Referendums Podcast #17

John Matsusaki joins the Democracy Paradox to make the case for National Referendums. He is the Charles F. Sexton Chair in American Enterprise at the University of Southern California and the author of Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge

National Referendums on SpotifyNational Referendums on Apple PodcastsNational Referendums on Google Podcasts National Referendums on Stitcher

An Absence of National Referendums

The United States has a long tradition of direct democracy through referendums dating back to the early years of the republic. Nearly every state today has some form of referendums or ballot initiatives. Yet the United States has never had a national referendum. John Matsusaka points out that from a comparative perspective, this is unusual. Nearly all other democracies have held national referendums, and many have made them a regular part of their political process. 

Matsusaka emphasizes tradition should not be an obstacle. He writes, “American democracy is not a static system created by the Founders, but a work in progress, an evolving set of practices that each generation has updated, largely by extending the scope of popular participation.” 

The Case for National Referendums

I share an optimistic conversation with John Matsusaka about the possibilities for direct democracy. There is a little bit of talk about Brexit and a few other countries like Switzerland are mentioned, but we mainly focus on the United States. John thinks the time is past due to introduce direct democracy on the national level. He writes in his book, “Although the Founders got some things wrong, they got many things right. We would like to know if omitting direct democracy was one of the things they got right, or one of their mistakes.”

John Matsusaka is the Charles F. Sexton Chair in American Enterprise at the University of Southern California and the author of Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge. An economist by training, he works on topics related to political economy, direct democracy, corporate finance, and corporate governance. 

Music from Apes of the State.

Related Content

Joshua J. Dyck and Edward L. Lascher, Jr. on Initiative Referendums

John Gastil and Katherine Knobloch on Citizen Initiative Review

Thoughts on Roslyn Fuller’s In Defence of Democracy

Leave a Reply

Up ↑

Discover more from Democracy Paradox

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading